Opened on May 26, 2009 at 6:10:21 PM
Closed on May 31, 2009 at 9:07:42 AM
Last modified on May 31, 2009 at 3:24:55 PM
#985 closed Bug (Fixed)
errors in der helpfile for AutoIt 3.3.1.0 Beta
| Reported by: | Tweaky | Owned by: | Valik |
|---|---|---|---|
| Milestone: | 3.3.1.1 | Component: | Documentation |
| Version: | 3.3.1.0 | Severity: | None |
| Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Hi,
we have translate the english helpfile into german.
So we see that some errors are in der the english helpfile.
Here ist an example what I mean (from 3.3.0.0)
here an example:
13 PixelSearch Number of variables wrong / variables differently / variables in different order (is | should) 4 | 8
Syntax:
PixelSearch ( left, top, right, bottom, color [, shade-variation [, step [, hwnd]]] )
Parameters:
left
top
right
bottom
colour
shade-variation
step
hwnd
4 | 8 means that the parameter 1, 2, 3 and 4 are identical in the syntax an the parameter list.
Parameter 5 ist wrong. Here it is only a write error (color <> colour)
here an example:
70 _GUICtrlListView_SimpleSort Number of variables wrong / variables differently / variables in different order (is | should) 2 | 3
Syntax:
_GUICtrlListView_SimpleSort($hWnd, ByRef $vDescending, $iCol)
Parameters:
$hWnd
$vDescending
2 | 3 means that the parameter 1 and 2 are identical in the syntax an the parameter list.
Parameter 3 is missing.
If you don`t know what I mean, please look here
http://www.autoitscript.com/trac/autoit/ticket/877
Attachments (1)
Change History (6)
by , on May 26, 2009 at 6:10:57 PM
| Attachment: | errors 3.3.1.0 Beta.txt added |
|---|
comment:1 by , on May 26, 2009 at 11:49:02 PM
1st off need to report bugs separately.
As far as I can tell from the convoluted description of the bug for _GUICtrlListView_SimpleSort, it's not a bug.
comment:2 by , on May 27, 2009 at 4:26:42 PM
Hi,
its only an example with _GUICtrlListView_SimpleSort.
I will only show what the numbers in my txt-file means
What does ou mean with "1st off need to report bugs separately."???
comment:3 by , on May 31, 2009 at 9:07:42 AM
| Milestone: | → 3.3.1.1 |
|---|---|
| Owner: | set to |
| Resolution: | → Fixed |
| Status: | new → closed |
Fixed in version: 3.3.1.1
comment:4 by , on May 31, 2009 at 9:14:24 AM
Could you please add a check in a future version to ensure that optional parameters have the "[optional]" tag. I forgot to add that tag for some of the changes which made me realize we've probably forgot to add it in a lot of places.

File with errors