Modify ↓
#723 closed Bug (No Bug)
Structure problem
Reported by: | trancexx | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | Component: | AutoIt | |
Version: | 3.2.12.1 | Severity: | Blocking |
Keywords: | DllStructureCreate(), align, DllStructGetPtr() | Cc: |
Description
Unexpected behaviour with function DllStructureCreate()when created with pointer and "dword":
ConsoleWrite("Binary data is 0x3378FF453D1133" & @CRLF & @CRLF) $structure_Binary_1 = DllStructCreate("byte[7]") DllStructSetData($structure_Binary_1, 1, "0x3378FF453D1133"); that is 0x3378 and 0xFF453D11, last byte 0x33 is just for testing ; Testing on "short;dword" $struct_1 = DllStructCreate("short;dword", DllStructGetPtr($structure_Binary_1)) ConsoleWrite("Before align:" & @CRLF) ConsoleWrite(Binary(DllStructGetData($struct_1, 1)) & " <-- Binary(short) - ok" & @CRLF) ConsoleWrite(Binary(DllStructGetData($struct_1, 2)) & " <-- Binary(dword) - 0xFF is missing and 0x33 is there" & @CRLF) ConsoleWrite(@CRLF) ; New structure is "short;dword" with keyword align $structure_Binary_2 = DllStructCreate("byte[7]") DllStructSetData($structure_Binary_2, 1, "0x3378FF453D1133") $struct_2 = DllStructCreate("align 1;short;dword", DllStructGetPtr($structure_Binary_2)) ; or "align 2" ConsoleWrite("After:" & @CRLF) ConsoleWrite(Binary(DllStructGetData($struct_2, 1)) & " <-- Binary(short)" & @CRLF) ConsoleWrite(Binary(DllStructGetData($struct_2, 2)) & " <-- Binary(dword), this appears ok" & @CRLF) ConsoleWrite(@CRLF) ; Testing on "dword;short" $structure_Binary_3 = DllStructCreate("byte[7]") DllStructSetData($structure_Binary_3, 1, "0x3378FF453D1133") $struct_3 = DllStructCreate("dword;short", DllStructGetPtr($structure_Binary_3)) ConsoleWrite("Reoganized (no align):" & @CRLF) ConsoleWrite(Binary(DllStructGetData($struct_3, 1)) & " <-- Binary(dword) - ok" & @CRLF) ConsoleWrite(Binary(DllStructGetData($struct_3, 2)) & " <-- Binary(short) - ok" & @CRLF)
Thread on forum:
http://www.autoitscript.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=85213
Attachments (0)
Change History (3)
comment:1 Changed 16 years ago by Valik
- Resolution set to No Bug
- Status changed from new to closed
comment:2 Changed 16 years ago by Valik
Ooops, here's the memory layout expressed in a fixed-width font so you may see the mapping.
3378FF453D113300 (Extra 00's added to pad length for clarity). SSSSPPPPDDDDDDDD (Where S = short, P = padding and D = dword).
comment:3 Changed 16 years ago by anonymous
Briliant and simple explanation.
...and if I set data manually (like copying from one structure to another) problem cannot occure because it's filled 8 and 8 and 8...
Thanks!
Guidelines for posting comments:
- You cannot re-open a ticket but you may still leave a comment if you have additional information to add.
- In-depth discussions should take place on the forum.
For more information see the full version of the ticket guidelines here.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
The code is correct. The helpfile almost explains why with this line:
The key there is, the int (dword in your example) starts at byte 4 (0-index) and not at byte 2 like you are thinking.
So, we have the data 0x3378FF453D1133. The 0x3378FF45 portion is mapped to the short but only the first 2 bytes are accessible (0x3378). The 0xFF45 portion is mapped to the 2 bytes of padding that appears between the short and the dword. That means that the dword is 0x3D113300. Visually it looks like:
3378FF453D113300 (Extra 00's added to pad length for clarity).
SSSSPPPPDDDDDDDD (Where S = short, P = padding and D = dword).
When you start changing the alignment, you remove the padding and the structures align correctly.
This is not a bug.