Opened 17 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
#663 closed Bug (Fixed)
AU3_PixelChecksum returns 0x80000000 if more than that
| Reported by: | Hollinar | Owned by: | Jon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Milestone: | 3.2.13.11 | Component: | AutoItX |
| Version: | 3.2.13.9 | Severity: | Blocking |
| Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
While making a c++ program to automate something, I ran into this problem. The DLL returns 0x8000000 if the checksum is more than that. I've searched the bug tracker for this problem and noticed a previous report where you wrote that it works for you. I've tried the same au3 script as was added to that report, and it doesn't end up with a value more than 0x80000000 so it doesn't cause the problem. However, the slightly modified version I've attached DOES cause the problem, using both 3.2.13.9 AND 3.2.12.1... The problem is, it doesn't cause the problem every time because each checksum is different.
Attachments (2)
Change History (9)
by , 17 years ago
| Attachment: | screenshot.PNG added |
|---|
follow-up: 2 comment:1 by , 17 years ago
The value that's returned is supposed to be unsigned but AutoItX is returning it signed. That needs to be corrected at which point it should also fix your issue as the code is identical except for the thin COM layer.
follow-up: 3 comment:2 by , 17 years ago
Replying to Valik:
The value that's returned is supposed to be unsigned but AutoItX is returning it signed. That needs to be corrected at which point it should also fix your issue as the code is identical except for the thin COM layer.
Any idea when this will be fixed? While my automation doesn't need it RIGHT now, it'll be needed sometime soon in the coding process
comment:3 by , 17 years ago
Replying to anonymous:
Replying to Valik:
The value that's returned is supposed to be unsigned but AutoItX is returning it signed. That needs to be corrected at which point it should also fix your issue as the code is identical except for the thin COM layer.
Any idea when this will be fixed? While my automation doesn't need it RIGHT now, it'll be needed sometime soon in the coding process
No longer a rush on this, I locked down some memory addresses that let me know when to click where.
comment:4 by , 17 years ago
| Severity: | None → Blocking |
|---|
comment:6 by , 17 years ago
| Severity: | None → Blocking |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
comment:7 by , 17 years ago
| Milestone: | → 3.2.13.11 |
|---|---|
| Resolution: | → Fixed |
| Status: | assigned → closed |

proof