#3766 closed Feature Request (Duplicate)
@IncludeScriptFullPath and @IncludeScriptName
| Reported by: | argumentum | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Milestone: | Component: | AutoIt | |
| Version: | Severity: | None | |
| Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
@ScriptLineNumber knows the #include.
I can write Func this($var = @ScriptLineNumber) and it knows, just knows, now, somewhere ( in AutoIt ) is kept\noted.
Therefore these macros, call them @IncludeScriptFullPath and @IncludeScriptName, would be complementary to @ScriptLineNumber.
I added a discussion at https://www.autoitscript.com/forum/topic/203009-scriptlinenumber-knows-the-include/ for a full explanation of the idea.
Attachments (0)
Change History (6)
comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by TicketCleanup
- Version 3.3.14.5 deleted
comment:2 Changed 4 years ago by mLipok
comment:3 Changed 4 years ago by mLipok
comment:4 Changed 4 years ago by Jos
- Resolution set to Duplicate
- Status changed from new to closed
comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by mLipok
for all interested "related" feature is here:
https://www.autoitscript.com/trac/autoit/ticket/2886
comment:6 Changed 22 months ago by argumentum
https://www.autoitscript.com/forum/topic/209823-scriptname-does-not-use-include-file/?do=findComment&comment=1514567 has code to show the importance of it.
Since "In-depth discussions should take place on the forum.", I'll carry this ticket there.
Guidelines for posting comments:
- You cannot re-open a ticket but you may still leave a comment if you have additional information to add.
- In-depth discussions should take place on the forum.
For more information see the full version of the ticket guidelines here.
Automatic ticket cleanup.