Opened 10 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#3273 closed Bug (Fixed)
_ArrayExtract: Error return value description
| Reported by: | Sponge Jhan | Owned by: | BrewManNH |
|---|---|---|---|
| Milestone: | 3.3.15.1 | Component: | Documentation |
| Version: | 3.3.14.2 | Severity: | None |
| Keywords: | _ArrayExtract | Cc: |
Description
_ArrayExtract returns an array on success, but Help file shows that the return value is 1.
(By the way, where can I get a version of AutoIt with this problem fixed? Thanks!)
Attachments (0)
Change History (4)
follow-up: 2 comment:1 by , 10 years ago
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
Replying to BrewManNH:
The only "problem" is the documentation, and you already know what the return value is, so what exactly do you need fixed?
The documentation can be fixed to reflect the correct return result, but other than that there's nothing to fix in the function itself.
comment:3 by , 10 years ago
Is there a reason you quoted what I said, because you forgot to add anything to your post?
In case you're wondering the line in your bug report I was responding to is this one:
By the way, where can I get a version of AutoIt with this problem fixed? Thanks!
My response was telling you that there's no reason to look for a "fixed" version of AutoIt because your complaint is a minor documentation error that doesn't affect anything in the function itself. Seeing as how you already know what the correct return value is, you shouldn't need an updated help file to know what to do with it.
It will get fixed when it gets fixed and now that you know what the correct return value is, write your scripts with that return value in mind.
comment:4 by , 9 years ago
| Milestone: | → 3.3.15.1 |
|---|---|
| Owner: | set to |
| Resolution: | → Fixed |
| Status: | new → closed |
Fixed by revision [11807] in version: 3.3.15.1

The only "problem" is the documentation, and you already know what the return value is, so what exactly do you need fixed?
The documentation can be fixed to reflect the correct return result, but other than that there's nothing to fix in the function itself.