Talk:Function list: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (header to first post (seems still relevant)) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:I don't really have a problem with this. '''But''' this also or makes orphans of the function_link pages. So I think the general question becomes whether or not to keep those function_link pages. (Think you just targeted half of the AutoIt wiki to the trashbin. *grin*) --[[User_talk:IEvKI3gv9Wrkd41u|<i><font color="#666" size="2px">.MvGulik.</font></i>]] 17:42, 11 November 2012 (GMT) | :I don't really have a problem with this. '''But''' this also or makes orphans of the function_link pages. So I think the general question becomes whether or not to keep those function_link pages. (Think you just targeted half of the AutoIt wiki to the trashbin. *grin*) --[[User_talk:IEvKI3gv9Wrkd41u|<i><font color="#666" size="2px">.MvGulik.</font></i>]] 17:42, 11 November 2012 (GMT) | ||
Meh, They've been around for years and who is going to manually maintain these pages. If Jon would allow a bot to do it then it wouldn't be a bad deal. [[User:Jaberwocky6669|Jaberwocky6669]] ([[User talk:Jaberwocky6669|talk]]) 22:03, 11 November 2012 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 22:03, 11 November 2012
(Old question)
This page appears to be a direct copy of the doc page. I'd like to organize these items by categories like "math", "IO", and "UI" in order to improve searching for a specific function. Is there any opposition to this? Mythobeast 05:17, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Link convertion
Converted all wiki links to template:Help File -- if this is unacceptable then just revert. (--Jaberwocky6669)
- I don't really have a problem with this. But this also or makes orphans of the function_link pages. So I think the general question becomes whether or not to keep those function_link pages. (Think you just targeted half of the AutoIt wiki to the trashbin. *grin*) --.MvGulik. 17:42, 11 November 2012 (GMT)
Meh, They've been around for years and who is going to manually maintain these pages. If Jon would allow a bot to do it then it wouldn't be a bad deal. Jaberwocky6669 (talk) 22:03, 11 November 2012 (GMT)