CPU Benchmark

[Alek]

love the GUI, looks awome

Test:   Dual/Quad Core optimization
Your time:   18.5283 sec
π (pi) result:   3.14159265358979
Your CPU:   AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+

[dansxmods]

Thank you very much for this beautiful script. Hope you don't mind I modified some of your code and used it in another one of my scripts.

Not Compiled:

Test: Dual/Quad Core optimization

Your time: 65.1522 sec

π (pi) result: 3.14159265358979

Your CPU: Intel® Pentium® D CPU 2.80GHz

Compiled:

Test: Dual/Quad Core optimization

Your time: 60.6 sec

π (pi) result: 3.14159265358979

Your CPU: Intel® Pentium® D CPU 2.80GHz

[sandin]

I'm glad you like it, and I don't mind if you use parts of the script for your script

[au3scr]

is this good or bad?

Test: Single Core optimization

Your time: 78.7572 sec

π (pi) result: 3.14159265358979

Your CPU: AMD Sempron Processor 2800+

[FireFox]

@au3scr

Look at mine (10sec)... Infortunately yours is very bad

Cheers, FireFox.

Edited January 8, 2009 by FireFox

[youknowwho4eva]

Hmmm That is fairly slow. Did you have a lot of stuff running? I had my online radio going, and at least 10 apps going when I did my tests.

[sandin]

that was single core test (which is slower for single and multi core CPUs), and it was updated today to use the same formula as Super Pi program. So in order to compare to others au3scr should do the test again with dual/quad core optimization.

btw my results for single core:

Test:   Single Core optimization
Your time:   41.488 sec
π (pi) result:   3.14159265358979
Your CPU:   AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+

and my dual/quad core results you can find in 1st post, 1st picture.

[youknowwho4eva]

Test: Single Core optimization

Your time: 43.4618 sec

π (pi) result: 3.14159265358979

Your CPU: Intel® Core2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz

Test: Dual/Quad Core optimization

Your time: 35.02 sec

π (pi) result: 3.14159265358979

Your CPU: Intel® Core2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz

A lot different now. I can't calculate pi by subtracting them any more

[UEZ]

How about to implement more functions like these ones?

n!:

0! = 1

if n > 0 then n! = n * (n - 1)!

Fibonnaci Numbers:

A1 = 0, A2 = 1,

An = An-1 + An-2

Number e:

e = lim n-> infinity (1 + (1 / n)) ^n = sum ( 1 / n!) where n = 0 to infinity

e = 2.71828...

Or Mandelbrot -> click me!

UEZ

Edited January 8, 2009 by UEZ

[au3scr]

with dual/quad core

Test: Dual/Quad Core optimization

Your time: 62.0742 sec

π (pi) result: 3.14159265358979

Your CPU: AMD Sempron Processor 2800+

system properties shows 1604 MHz

Edited January 8, 2009 by au3scr

[UEZ]

You can add e.g. this function to get real max. CPU speed:

Func CPU_Speed($system)
    Local $objWMIService = ObjGet("winmgmts:{impersonationLevel=impersonate}!\\" & $system & "\root\cimv2")
    Local $colItems = $objWMIService.ExecQuery("Select MaxClockSpeed from Win32_Processor", "WQL", 0x30)
    Local $HW_Processor_MaxClockSpeed
    If IsObj($colItems) Then
        For $objItem In $colItems
            $HW_Processor_MaxClockSpeed = Round($objItem.MaxClockSpeed, 0) & " Hz"
        Next
        Return $HW_Processor_MaxClockSpeed
    Else
        Return "n.a."
    EndIf
EndFunc

UEZ

[youknowwho4eva]

If I'm not mistaken your processor only has one core. Running dual/quad won't do anything.

[FireFox]

Almost same results as before :

Test:   Dual/Quad Core optimization
Your time:   12.2534 sec
π (pi) result:   3.14159265358979
Your CPU:   Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Extreme Quad CPU QX9770 @ 3.2 GHz

Cheers, FireFox.

Edited January 8, 2009 by FireFox

[Emiel Wieldraaijer]

Hi All,

too bad the WMI is not accurate when retrieving the processor name My Dual Xeon QuadCore is detected as a Pentium III Xeon, i believe the best way is to do it through the registry..

The following example will retrieve the processorname for 32 bits and 64 bits os

$HKCU = "HKEY_CURRENT_USER"
$HKLM = "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE"

If @OSArch = "X64" Then ; Or @ProcessorArch depends on AutoIt version
    $HKCU &= "64"
    $HKLM &= "64"
EndIf

$ProName = StringStripWS(RegRead($HKLM & "\HARDWARE\DESCRIPTION\System\CentralProcessor\0", "ProcessorNameString"), 4)
$TotalCores = EnvGet("NUMBER_OF_PROCESSORS") ;

Msgbox (0, "Information", "ProcesorName = " & $ProName & " TotalCores in your System = " & $TotalCores)

[lxxl]

ha nice tools, working also on Atom CPU on my AOA150 with Vista

Test:   Dual/Quad Core optimization
Your time:   92.7899 sec
π (pi) result:   3.14159265358979
Your CPU:   Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N270 @ 1.60GHz
CPU cores:   2

[Negative1]

How come dual/quad optimization out performs single core optimization on single core computers?

[SkellySoul]

This GUI is the best I seen yet that doesn't use any resources such as dll's or images.

The code is a little hard for me to read at the moment but can you share how I can make my GUI's look like that this would be great.

[Hest]

I have a weird problem with the test, dunno if someone mentioned it. I have a singlecore CPU on this computer, but then I press to test dualcore, it finishes alot faster and gives me a better score.

[LDericher]

Test: Dual/Quad Core optimization

Your time: 18.5598 sec

π (pi) result: 3.14159265358979

Your CPU: Intel® Core2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz

I'm a winnerrrrrr

Not any longer

Test:   Dual/Quad Core optimization
Your time:   18.0244 sec
π (pi) result:   3.14159265358979
Your CPU:   AMD Athlon(tm) 7750 Dual-Core Processor
CPU cores:   2

Now I'm the one ^^ with 56 processes running

LDer.

Edit1: Now, OK, FireFox' CPU was faster^^ but... I doubt he can do that again with 2*Delphi IDE open, Firefox, Thunderbird and AutoIt also running...

That's just unfair, he's got a QUADcore... nice, man

Regards,

The LDer

Edited April 29, 2009 by LDericher

[Hest]

Test: Dual/Quad Core optimization

Your time: 12.2498 sec

π (pi) result: 3.14159265358979

Your CPU: Intel® Core2 Duo CPU E6850 @ 3.00GHz