Richard Robertson Posted March 28, 2008 Posted March 28, 2008 So that means you made me misinformed too.
The Kandie Man Posted March 28, 2008 Posted March 28, 2008 (edited) Have you tried using the native AutoIt function WinKill() on the IE7 window that needs to be closed?Edit: If your only reason for detecting that the window has been closed is to close it faster, then WinKill() should work fine. If you are trying to do something else, then nevermind.- The Kandie Man ;-) Edited March 28, 2008 by The Kandie Man "So man has sown the wind and reaped the world. Perhaps in the next few hours there will no remembrance of the past and no hope for the future that might have been." & _"All the works of man will be consumed in the great fire after which he was created." & _"And if there is a future for man, insensitive as he is, proud and defiant in his pursuit of power, let him resolve to live it lovingly, for he knows well how to do so." & _"Then he may say once more, 'Truly the light is sweet, and what a pleasant thing it is for the eyes to see the sun.'" - The Day the Earth Caught Fire
Siao Posted March 28, 2008 Posted March 28, 2008 Well, that shell hook I posted isn't a SetWindowsHookEx type hook, just a no-dll version of WH_SHELL which M$ thought to be worthwhile to be made for whatever reason. Other hooks need a dll, except for WH_KEYBOARD_LL, WH_MOUSE_LL as noted, and I think WH_JOURNALRECORD/WH_JOURNALPLAYBACK too. "be smart, drink your wine"
FreeFry Posted March 28, 2008 Posted March 28, 2008 (edited) So that means you made me misinformed too.Well not really, I was talking about hooks, the solutions that Smoke_N posted doesn't use hooks, but doesn't either to exactly what I had in mind(basically hooking into the window procedure, and waiting for either the WM_CLOSE, or the WM_SYSCOMMAND message...)Edit:I wonder over the reason that some hooks can be made without a dll, whilst some require it... Is there some technical obstacle that would prevent it, or is it just microsoft laziness? Edited March 28, 2008 by FreeFry
Moderators SmOke_N Posted March 28, 2008 Moderators Posted March 28, 2008 Edit:I wonder over the reason that some hooks can be made without a dll, whilst some require it... Is there some technical obstacle that would prevent it, or is it just microsoft laziness?Not all "GUIs" are microsoft "standard". Common sense plays a role in the basics of understanding AutoIt... If you're lacking in that, do us all a favor, and step away from the computer.
FreeFry Posted March 28, 2008 Posted March 28, 2008 Yeah, but still, wouldn't it be less of a hassle if the developer himself has to determine if the window is a microsoft standard one, and not having to use a dll just because? // Sorry if I'm stealing your thread here R6V2.. curiosity strikes.
Moderators SmOke_N Posted March 28, 2008 Moderators Posted March 28, 2008 (edited) Yeah, but still, wouldn't it be less of a hassle if the developer himself has to determine if the window is a microsoft standard one, and not having to use a dll just because? // Sorry if I'm stealing your thread here R6V2.. curiosity strikes.Well, depending on the language they are using, they very well may have the choice on what type of standard/non-standard gui they choose to make. Edited March 28, 2008 by SmOke_N Noticed ebonics Common sense plays a role in the basics of understanding AutoIt... If you're lacking in that, do us all a favor, and step away from the computer.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now