Web-based AutoIt! - New with AuCGI!

[BasicOs]

well, you could do that since September, as I posted runmefromweb, .. late but you did..

Now the good side of this is that I think that devs will make another forum thread for Autoit Hyperlink, as askay will be overlasting new topics (overposting) with thousands of new remote apps ... , one for every programm in the market jejeje

first runmefromweb whatever programm or app

second autoit compiler,

third start vnc from web

.... let us see many more

I recomend open your cd tray from web or play a song or a voice from web, so your family will be surprised if their house is ghosted, jajaja

also for turning lights on and off .. should be a nice udf.. ...

or send an email from remote ...

also for central heating on, or warm coffe machine

Well, This is good, Now I can make a "remote control" to turn remote admin on and off ^^

I go to the page, (from someone elses pc) and click start, and itll run it on this pc , And stop stops it. Funkeh eh? Ima make a fully fledged webbased remote control, lol.

Edited October 9, 2006 by BasicOs

[spyrorocks]

hey AzKay, thats a good idea. I think im gonna work on that

I have some ideas on how that can me accomplaced in a web-like manner.

[McGod]

Wow, ingenious, its like PHP! Woot!! *Couples this with SQLite to make the Web Au3 Baby*

[theguy0000]

hey AzKay, thats a good idea. I think im gonna work on that

I have some ideas on how that can me accomplaced in a web-like manner.

I've already started working on it, hope to get something released soon.

[AzKay]

well, you could do that since September, as I posted runmefromweb, .. late but you did..

Now the good side of this is that I think that devs will make another forum thread for Autoit Hyperlink, as askay will be overlasting new topics (overposting) with thousands of new remote apps ... , one for every programm in the market jejeje

first runmefromweb whatever programm or app

second autoit compiler,

third start vnc from web

.... let us see many more

I recomend open your cd tray from web or play a song or a voice from web, so your family will be surprised if their house is ghosted, jajaja

also for turning lights on and off .. should be a nice udf.. ...

or send an email from remote ...

also for central heating on, or warm coffe machine

Geez, Enough with your script. Everytime someone posts an idea about something, Which ISNT your thread, you just go and tell everyone about your script, Youve made a topic, youve got it in your signature, Stop posting it in everyone elses threads

[AzKay]

hey AzKay, thats a good idea. I think im gonna work on that

I have some ideas on how that can me accomplaced in a web-like manner.

Well, All I did was,

One script:

Run("C:\WINDOWS\system32\rserver30\rserver3.exe /start")

Then another

Run("C:\WINDOWS\system32\rserver30\rserver3.exe /stop")

Then a html page with two buttons, One start, one stop.

Start runs the first script, and stop runs the second

[spyrorocks]

Mine so far allows you to see a image of your desktop and when you click onnthe image, it simulates a mouse click on that exact same place on your computer. it surrently supports dubble click, left click, and right click.

[theguy0000]

made it so that a custom content type can be set when calling _startWebBasedApp ( ). (instead of the default "text/html"). Don't have time to update the docs for now, i will soon.

Edited October 12, 2006 by theguy0000

[theguy0000]

what do you guys think about making WebApp.au3 a standard include file?

[spyrorocks]

Would be cool

My remote admin thingy is turning out well. Just some compatability issues with IE and Firefox.

[theguy0000]

*whew* finally got all the documentation done. I'm about to PM JdeB, see if I get it.

[Jos]

*whew* finally got all the documentation done. I'm about to PM JdeB, see if I get it.

I received your submition, but still fail to see how this will be something the avarage scripter is looking for.

This looks more like an application then additional functions for your average script project.

Edited October 22, 2006 by JdeB

[theguy0000]

it's not an application...

it's a bunch of UDFs for giving autoit the ability to make web-based applications.

Where in the script does it actually do anything? just a bunch of UDFs and variables. If you run it...well if you actually run it, it hangs, because it's meant to be called from a web browser and using a web server. But the point is, it doesn't actually do anything on its own, just functions and vars.

And anyone wishing to make a web-based application needs these UDFs to do so (or they would pretty much be doing the exact same thing as the UDFs, the UDFs just make it shorter, but isnt that what every UDF does?).

[Jos]

it's not an application...

it's a bunch of UDFs for giving autoit the ability to make web-based applications.

Where in the script does it actually do anything? just a bunch of UDFs and variables. If you run it...well if you actually run it, it hangs, because it's meant to be called from a web browser and using a web server. But the point is, it doesn't actually do anything on its own, just functions and vars.

And anyone wishing to make a web-based application needs these UDFs to do so (or they would pretty much be doing the exact same thing as the UDFs, the UDFs just make it shorter, but isnt that what every UDF does?).

I have no opinion good or bad about your UDF's, but we need to be selective in what we put into the Standard include libraries.

I am trying to follow a simple guideline for this: It needs to be a function scripters will need on a regular basis.

No offence intended just trying to be honest with you.

Edited October 22, 2006 by JdeB

[theguy0000]

I have no opinion good or bad about your UDF's, but we need to be selective in what we put into the Standard include libraries.

I am trying to follow a simple guideline for this: It needs to be a function scripters will need on a regular basis.

No offence intended just trying to be honest with you.

I know, and I understand, But you said it seems to be an App and not UDFs meant for a scripting projects, but I'm not sure what you mean by that, because it is just a collection of UDFs and variables.

Plus, nothing like this (to my limited knowledge of the community) has been done with AutoIt before, and this could open a whole new world of possibilities with AutoIt, bring it out of just application programming and let it make web apps, too.

and as for it being used widely, I have seen a shocking amount of good comments here, much more than I expected. It seems to be widely liked.

Edited October 22, 2006 by theguy0000

[JSThePatriot]

I know, and I understand, But you said it seems to be an App and not UDFs meant for a scripting projects, but I'm not sure what you mean by that, because it is just a collection of UDFs and variables.

Plus, nothing like this (to my limited knowledge of the community) has been done with AutoIt before, and this could open a whole new world of possibilities with AutoIt, bring it out of just application programming and let it make web apps, too.

and as for it being used widely, I have seen a shocking amount of good comments here, much more than I expected. It seems to be widely liked.

I think what JdeB means, is not how popular your application is, nor how good or bad it is. He stated himself he isnt rating your project. The standard includes have grown very rapidly, and they need to watch the installation space used. I know this isnt the main reason, but it is still there.

On top of that your functions are not of any use by themselves. They require each other. Are there some UDF's that do this as well? Yes, certainly, but his point is you have more of an Server App, that is written in functions. Not to mention the "average" scripter isnt really going to be building their own web server.

I would recommend you keep up the good work, you will continue to get replies, and you can possibly hope for a sticky status of some sort.

JS

[theguy0000]

I think what JdeB means, is not how popular your application is, nor how good or bad it is. He stated himself he isnt rating your project. The standard includes have grown very rapidly, and they need to watch the installation space used. I know this isnt the main reason, but it is still there.

On top of that your functions are not of any use by themselves. They require each other. Are there some UDF's that do this as well? Yes, certainly, but his point is you have more of an Server App, that is written in functions. Not to mention the "average" scripter isnt really going to be building their own web server.

I would recommend you keep up the good work, you will continue to get replies, and you can possibly hope for a sticky status of some sort.

JS

Hmm, I know, it's just that i spent all that time to get them to satisfy all the standards...

[JSThePatriot]

Hmm, I know, it's just that i spent all that time to get them to satisfy all the standards...

Well they may eventually be included so the work wasnt for waste.

You could also create a little installer that would place your scripts in the includes folder and distribute that.

JS

[Wus]

Hmm, I know, it's just that i spent all that time to get them to satisfy all the standards...

Whatever I have said about this project (and still believe) the work you put into it will not go unappreciated. In addition, the time you spend making it fit the "standards" was time well spent. Its very good practice to make sure everything you ever code is to certain standards and the time you spent on that will only improve your coding.

[NELyon]

New Function's i'm working on:

Func WebObjCreate($Obj, Global $ObjName, $nEnd = 0)
    Local $out 
If $nEnd = 0 then 
    $out &="<script Type=Text/Javascript Language=Javascript>"
    $out &="var "&$ObjName&" = ActiveXObj("&$Obj&")"
    ConsoleWrite($out)
EndIf
If $nEnd = <> 0 Then 
    $out &="<script Type=Text/Javascript Language=Javascript>"
    $out &="var "&$ObjName&" = NewActiveXObj("&$Obj&")"
    $out &="</script>"
EndIf
EndFunc
oÝ÷ ج¶X¤xæã
·µëhr·µà¶+ÞæãyËlxÚ½«®*mjëh×6
Func WebObjFunction($ObjName, $Function)
    Local $out
    $out &=$ObjName&"."&$Function&"("&$Func&")"
    ConsoleWrite($out)
EndFunc

Use that to close the script.

If you want to use functions, leave $nEnd to 0, so you can use

them. Then just end it with WebObjEnd

NOTE:Not tested

Edited October 23, 2006 by codemyster