Jump to content

A3X - Integrate file version


Go to solution Solved by argumentum,

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I am aware that it is not possible to directly version information to an encoded (a3x) script.

Appending the desired file version via HexEditor does the job and the script is running (even with the version number appended).

In the beginning and end of the encoded script I can see "AU3!EA06" which I guess is some kind of internal marking for the start and end of the encoded script. Is it safe to assume, that this kind of appendix at the end of the file is okay?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Developers

Why not simply adding a msgbox with the version info to the script and display it when a specific parameter is used?

SciTE4AutoIt3 Full installer Download page   - Beta files       Read before posting     How to post scriptsource   Forum etiquette  Forum Rules 
 
Live for the present,
Dream of the future,
Learn from the past.
  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can pass command line parameters to .a3x / .au3 files as well (similar to .exe). Define a constant for the respective version number in the script. If the script is started e.g. with /V (freely definable), you can have the version number returned. This seems to be easier than using a HEX editor. 

Musashi-C64.png

"In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jos said:

Why not simply adding a msgbox with the version info to the script and display it when a specific parameter is used?

Idea behind it is to collect version installed on various computers. It will be either Appending the data or using your suggestions.

5 hours ago, Musashi said:

You can pass command line parameters to .a3x / .au3 files as well (similar to .exe). Define a constant for the respective version number in the script. If the script is started e.g. with /V (freely definable), you can have the version number returned. This seems to be easier than using a HEX editor. 

I understand that. Hex editor was only to get a proof of concept. This would be automated during compilation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...