Administrators Jon Posted November 4, 2007 Administrators Posted November 4, 2007 3.2.9.6 (4th November, 2007) (Beta) - Fixed: Looping GUIRegisterMsg() doesn't unregister. (Thanks Saunders) - Fixed: Focus on ES_READONLY edit control. (Thanks BillB) Also, added x64 files to the installer. When installing on x64 you will be asked if you wish to use x64 versions where possible. These currently are: AutoIt, Aut2Exe, Au3Info and AutoItX. Additional right click items of Run Script (x86) and Compile Script (x86) will be added to make it easier to run scripts in the x86 mode as well (if something isn't working under x64). Hopefully this will make it easier to test - I'll be running my own installation on x64 like this from now on. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/
randallc Posted November 4, 2007 Posted November 4, 2007 hi, Sorry if there is an easy answer, but is there an easily reachable list of deprecated UDFs for ListView (now they seem to have been removed) in the Help Files or elsewhere ,so I can see how to convert them? Best, randall ExcelCOM... AccessCom.. Word2... FileListToArrayNew...SearchMiner... Regexps...SQL...Explorer...Array2D.. _GUIListView...array problem...APITailRW
GaryFrost Posted November 4, 2007 Posted November 4, 2007 hi,Sorry if there is an easy answer, but is there an easily reachable list of deprecated UDFs for ListView (now they seem to have been removed) in the Help Files or elsewhere ,so I can see how to convert them?Best, randallLook at the top of the include SciTE for AutoItDirections for Submitting Standard UDFs Don't argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference.
Administrators Jon Posted November 6, 2007 Administrators Posted November 6, 2007 3.2.9.7 (6th November, 2007) (Beta) - Fixed: Arithmetic (addition and subtraction) not working on Variants containing pointers. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/
Administrators Jon Posted November 6, 2007 Administrators Posted November 6, 2007 3.2.9.8 (6th November, 2007) (Beta) - Added: DllStructCreate() added "align" keyword to set structure alignment. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/
JohnBailey Posted November 8, 2007 Posted November 8, 2007 Mods: you are welcome to move this or delete it if I'm out of line asking this here. I just don't know where to ask this.Are A3LHeader-type functions going to be included in an upcoming version of Beta or Production release? I'm redoing PaulIA's functions and constants to be compatible with the latest Beta. However, this is taking a lot of time. You're all more than welcome to geekSlap me, but can someone direct me to answer of sorts.An example of a function that I haven't found in the Beta is _Header_GetItemFlags(), while many have indeed been included. A decision is a powerful thing
GaryFrost Posted November 8, 2007 Posted November 8, 2007 Mods: you are welcome to move this or delete it if I'm out of line asking this here. I just don't know where to ask this.Are A3LHeader-type functions going to be included in an upcoming version of Beta or Production release? I'm redoing PaulIA's functions and constants to be compatible with the latest Beta. However, this is taking a lot of time. You're all more than welcome to geekSlap me, but can someone direct me to answer of sorts.An example of a function that I haven't found in the Beta is _Header_GetItemFlags(), while many have indeed been included.How hard you want to be geek Slapped? Look in the Beta Help UDF section you'll see most of that is already in, and I'm working the remaining few..... SciTE for AutoItDirections for Submitting Standard UDFs Don't argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference.
JohnBailey Posted November 8, 2007 Posted November 8, 2007 How hard you want to be geek Slapped? Look in the Beta Help UDF section you'll see most of that is already in, and I'm working the remaining few.....hahaha! And that's great to hear!! Wonderful, wonderful job as always! I still don't see the header stuff, but I trust you. I'll keep looking. A decision is a powerful thing
GaryFrost Posted November 8, 2007 Posted November 8, 2007 hahaha! And that's great to hear!! Wonderful, wonderful job as always! I still don't see the header stuff, but I trust you. I'll keep looking.GuiHeader, hard to miss SciTE for AutoItDirections for Submitting Standard UDFs Don't argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference.
JohnBailey Posted November 8, 2007 Posted November 8, 2007 GuiHeader, hard to missI had 9.3 not 9.8. WAY WAY WAY WAY RAD The new udfs since 9.3 have what I wanted and more!!! KEEP UP THE AMAZING WORK Gary!! Thanks for the reply. I hadn't checked for updates for a few weeks. Thanks! A decision is a powerful thing
Administrators Jon Posted November 10, 2007 Administrators Posted November 10, 2007 3.2.9.9 (10th November, 2007) (Beta) - Changed: Limits on Execute() removed. - Fixed: DllStructCreate() now properly aligns the end of the structure if required. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/
jvanegmond Posted November 10, 2007 Posted November 10, 2007 - Changed: Limits on Execute() removed.Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! github.com/jvanegmond
Valik Posted November 10, 2007 Posted November 10, 2007 Somebody give me a performance report. I'm curious as to whether or not the Execute limitation increased the overall speed of AutoIt functions calls (All function calls, not just Execute in particular).
Administrators Jon Posted November 10, 2007 Administrators Posted November 10, 2007 From what I saw, every function call was checked for a flag if it was allowed to be used in Execute and then if it was currently being "executed". The check is now gone so it's essentially 2 boolean checks per function call faster. It's not going to be noticable I imagine. (I'd do a proper check but AutoIt is currently trashed on my machine due to installer rewrites) Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/
Valik Posted November 10, 2007 Posted November 10, 2007 Use a virtual machine (for testing the installer rewrites)? Little late now, of course. But yeah, I'm curious just how much those 2 boolean checks were adding.
GEOSoft Posted November 11, 2007 Posted November 11, 2007 I'd do a proper check but AutoIt is currently trashed on my machine due to installer rewritesNeed a download link? What are the odds of someday coming up with a Zip file that only includes AutoIt without all the third party stuff?Even without the examples would be okay.You're adding a lot of weight with the non-AutoIt components. I think those should be handled as add-ons. George Question about decompiling code? Read the decompiling FAQ and don't bother posting the question in the forums.Be sure to read and follow the forum rules. -AKA the AutoIt Reading and Comprehension Skills test.*** The PCRE (Regular Expression) ToolKit for AutoIT - (Updated Oct 20, 2011 ver:3.0.1.13) - Please update your current version before filing any bug reports. The installer now includes both 32 and 64 bit versions. No change in version number. Visit my Blog .. currently not active but it will soon be resplendent with news and views. Also please remove any links you may have to my website. it is soon to be closed and replaced with something else. "Old age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill!"
Administrators Jon Posted November 12, 2007 Administrators Posted November 12, 2007 3.2.9.10 (12th November, 2007) (Beta) - Fixed: DllCall() stack error if multiple DllCalls happen at the same time. Also, quite a lot of rework done on the installer so it might be buggy. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/
Valik Posted November 12, 2007 Posted November 12, 2007 Also, quite a lot of rework done on the installer so it might be buggy.AKA as the "Valik bitches too much fix".
Administrators Jon Posted November 12, 2007 Administrators Posted November 12, 2007 AKA as the "Valik bitches too much fix".lol Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/
Administrators Jon Posted November 15, 2007 Administrators Posted November 15, 2007 3.2.9.11 (15th November, 2007) (Beta) - Changed: Added a temporary pop-up warning when deprecated DllCall types are used. - Fixed: UPX is not used when creating a 64bit compiled script. Due to DllCall silently failing when you try and use the long_ptr types and causing lots of bug reports this will now popup a warning message. The warnings will be removed after the next production version is released. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now