Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Administrators
Posted

3.2.9.6 (4th November, 2007) (Beta)

- Fixed: Looping GUIRegisterMsg() doesn't unregister. (Thanks Saunders)

- Fixed: Focus on ES_READONLY edit control. (Thanks BillB)

Also, added x64 files to the installer. When installing on x64 you will be asked if you wish to use x64 versions where possible. These currently are: AutoIt, Aut2Exe, Au3Info and AutoItX. Additional right click items of Run Script (x86) and Compile Script (x86) will be added to make it easier to run scripts in the x86 mode as well (if something isn't working under x64). Hopefully this will make it easier to test - I'll be running my own installation on x64 like this from now on.

  • Replies 641
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

hi,

Sorry if there is an easy answer, but is there an easily reachable list of deprecated UDFs for ListView (now they seem to have been removed) in the Help Files or elsewhere ,so I can see how to convert them?

Best, randall

Look at the top of the include

SciTE for AutoItDirections for Submitting Standard UDFs

 

Don't argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference.

 

Posted

Mods: you are welcome to move this or delete it if I'm out of line asking this here. I just don't know where to ask this.

Are A3LHeader-type functions going to be included in an upcoming version of Beta or Production release? I'm redoing PaulIA's functions and constants to be compatible with the latest Beta. However, this is taking a lot of time.

You're all more than welcome to geekSlap me, but can someone direct me to answer of sorts.

An example of a function that I haven't found in the Beta is _Header_GetItemFlags(), while many have indeed been included.

A decision is a powerful thing
Posted

Mods: you are welcome to move this or delete it if I'm out of line asking this here. I just don't know where to ask this.

Are A3LHeader-type functions going to be included in an upcoming version of Beta or Production release? I'm redoing PaulIA's functions and constants to be compatible with the latest Beta. However, this is taking a lot of time.

You're all more than welcome to geekSlap me, but can someone direct me to answer of sorts.

An example of a function that I haven't found in the Beta is _Header_GetItemFlags(), while many have indeed been included.

How hard you want to be geek Slapped? <_<

Look in the Beta Help UDF section you'll see most of that is already in, and I'm working the remaining few.....

SciTE for AutoItDirections for Submitting Standard UDFs

 

Don't argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference.

 

Posted

How hard you want to be geek Slapped? <_<

Look in the Beta Help UDF section you'll see most of that is already in, and I'm working the remaining few.....

hahaha! And that's great to hear!! Wonderful, wonderful job as always! I still don't see the header stuff, but I trust you. I'll keep looking.

A decision is a powerful thing
Posted

GuiHeader, hard to miss

I had 9.3 not 9.8. :P

WAY WAY WAY WAY RAD :)<_< The new udfs since 9.3 have what I wanted and more!!! KEEP UP THE AMAZING WORK Gary!! Thanks for the reply. I hadn't checked for updates for a few weeks. Thanks!

A decision is a powerful thing
Posted

Somebody give me a performance report. I'm curious as to whether or not the Execute limitation increased the overall speed of AutoIt functions calls (All function calls, not just Execute in particular).

  • Administrators
Posted

From what I saw, every function call was checked for a flag if it was allowed to be used in Execute and then if it was currently being "executed". The check is now gone so it's essentially 2 boolean checks per function call faster. It's not going to be noticable I imagine. (I'd do a proper check but AutoIt is currently trashed on my machine due to installer rewrites)

Posted

Use a virtual machine (for testing the installer rewrites)? Little late now, of course.

But yeah, I'm curious just how much those 2 boolean checks were adding.

Posted

I'd do a proper check but AutoIt is currently trashed on my machine due to installer rewrites

Need a download link? :P

What are the odds of someday coming up with a Zip file that only includes AutoIt without all the third party stuff?

Even without the examples would be okay.

You're adding a lot of weight with the non-AutoIt components. I think those should be handled as add-ons.

George

Question about decompiling code? Read the decompiling FAQ and don't bother posting the question in the forums.

Be sure to read and follow the forum rules. -AKA the AutoIt Reading and Comprehension Skills test.***

The PCRE (Regular Expression) ToolKit for AutoIT - (Updated Oct 20, 2011 ver:3.0.1.13) - Please update your current version before filing any bug reports. The installer now includes both 32 and 64 bit versions. No change in version number.

Visit my Blog .. currently not active but it will soon be resplendent with news and views. Also please remove any links you may have to my website. it is soon to be closed and replaced with something else.

"Old age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill!"

  • Administrators
Posted

3.2.9.11 (15th November, 2007) (Beta)

- Changed: Added a temporary pop-up warning when deprecated DllCall types are used.

- Fixed: UPX is not used when creating a 64bit compiled script.

Due to DllCall silently failing when you try and use the long_ptr types and causing lots of bug reports this will now popup a warning message. The warnings will be removed after the next production version is released.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...