Administrators Jon Posted July 25, 2014 Author Administrators Share Posted July 25, 2014 That means we have to review code where a zero-size variable e.g. Binary('') may be passed or result in a buffer of size zero then adjust things with new error codes. Just WinAPI[Ex] is a lot! Can you give some examples? I don't know any winapi that when expecting a string wouldn't expecting a string pointer that just points to a memory location than in turn contains a single 0 char. The struct you are asking about can't exist This won't even compile: struct { char new[0]; } test; So no winapi would ever be able to handle it. Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Jon Posted July 25, 2014 Author Administrators Share Posted July 25, 2014 Hello! After version 3.3.13.7 arrays work noticably slower -- from ~11% slower for 1D arrays to ~24% for 3D array... And btw, curiously enough, version 3.3.13.6 is slightly faster that 3.3.12.0 Fixed next beta. JScript 1 Deployment Blog: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/blog/ SCCM SDK Programming: https://www.autoitconsulting.com/site/sccm-sdk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now