Guest Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 hello, i found a security hole in the compiler.. the hole is that there is a easy way to know on which programing language the script/software is written and this info is a good start point for haker.. Assuming we deleted the autoit icon and any other identifying mark in the exe file, there is a still way to know the programing language! this is the security hole: after the exe file was built: 1) open the exe file with NotePad++ (text editor) 2) Change an ordinary letter to a different letter like i did it this example: 3) Save the exe file now if you will run the exe file, you will get this error massage: the error massage notes that the exe file was Written in Autolt. i think that this is a security hole because it gives a starting point about on which programing language the exe was written.. is there a way to fix it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamtheky Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 you didnt see AU3! in plain text while in notepad++ ,-. .--. ________ .-. .-. ,---. ,-. .-. .-. .-. |(| / /\ \ |\ /| |__ __||| | | || .-' | |/ / \ \_/ )/ (_) / /__\ \ |(\ / | )| | | `-' | | `-. | | / __ \ (_) | | | __ | (_)\/ | (_) | | .-. | | .-' | | \ |__| ) ( | | | | |)| | \ / | | | | | |)| | `--. | |) \ | | `-' |_| (_) | |\/| | `-' /( (_)/( __.' |((_)-' /(_| '-' '-' (__) (__) (_) (__) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnOne Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 Not a security concern at all. If someone wants to know if a file is autoit script they need look to further than scripts here on the forum. AutoIt Absolute Beginners Require a serial Pause Script Video Tutorials by Morthawt ipify Monkey's are, like, natures humans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireFox Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 You still have many things to detect it's an autoit executable... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willichan Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 I didn't think there was any attempt intended to hide AutoIt as the source of the EXE. My UDFs: Barcode Libraries, Automate creation of any type of project folder, File Locking with Cooperative Semaphores, Inline binary files, Continue script after reboot, WinWaitMulti, Name Aggregator, Enigma, CornedBeef Hash Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 You still have many things to detect it's an autoit executable... So what should be done to hide this information completely? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireFox Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 So what should be done to hide this information completely?You can't is the answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Melba23 Posted August 15, 2013 Moderators Share Posted August 15, 2013 gil900,Why are some people so mad keen on protecting their compiled executables? What on earth do you code that you all feel needs so much protection? Once again: AutoIt is not and never will be secure - which is also true for any other language. Being interpreted just makes AutoIt an easier target. And the "hole" you point to above is not really that useful to a hacker - I would suggest that having the entire interpreter in each executable is a much bigger giveaway than a simple MsgBox. And could I also point out that doing what you say you have done ("deleted the autoit icon and any other identifying mark in the exe file") could be considered in contravention of the EULA: "Reverse engineering. You may not reverse engineer or disassemble the SOFTWARE PRODUCT or compiled scripts that were created with the SOFTWARE PRODUCT"M23 Any of my own code posted anywhere on the forum is available for use by others without any restriction of any kind Open spoiler to see my UDFs: Spoiler ArrayMultiColSort ---- Sort arrays on multiple columnsChooseFileFolder ---- Single and multiple selections from specified path treeview listingDate_Time_Convert -- Easily convert date/time formats, including the language usedExtMsgBox --------- A highly customisable replacement for MsgBoxGUIExtender -------- Extend and retract multiple sections within a GUIGUIFrame ---------- Subdivide GUIs into many adjustable framesGUIListViewEx ------- Insert, delete, move, drag, sort, edit and colour ListView itemsGUITreeViewEx ------ Check/clear parent and child checkboxes in a TreeViewMarquee ----------- Scrolling tickertape GUIsNoFocusLines ------- Remove the dotted focus lines from buttons, sliders, radios and checkboxesNotify ------------- Small notifications on the edge of the displayScrollbars ----------Automatically sized scrollbars with a single commandStringSize ---------- Automatically size controls to fit textToast -------------- Small GUIs which pop out of the notification area Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators JLogan3o13 Posted August 15, 2013 Moderators Share Posted August 15, 2013 If only the world were filled with hackers who thought they'd stumbled on something big by opening a script in Notepad++, we'd all be safe! 0xdefea7 1 "Profanity is the last vestige of the feeble mind. For the man who cannot express himself forcibly through intellect must do so through shock and awe" - Spencer W. Kimball How to get your question answered on this forum! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireFox Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 If only the world were filled with hackers who thought they'd stumbled on something big by opening a script in Notepad++, we'd all be safe! Yeah I think I have decrypted the source code corresponding to the first line... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edano Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 but a more neutral error messagebox would be nice. like: scriptname error, abnormal termination. it's on my autoit wish list [color=rgb(255,0,0);][font="'comic sans ms', cursive;"]FukuLeaks[/color][/font] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 but a more neutral error messagebox would be nice. like: scriptname error, abnormal termination. it's on my autoit wish list I agree with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators JLogan3o13 Posted August 15, 2013 Moderators Share Posted August 15, 2013 And I would ask the same question as Melba. Why that level of paranoia? If you are coding something that super-secret, AutoIt shouldn't be your language of choice in the first place. "Profanity is the last vestige of the feeble mind. For the man who cannot express himself forcibly through intellect must do so through shock and awe" - Spencer W. Kimball How to get your question answered on this forum! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edano Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 And I would ask the same question as Melba. Why that level of paranoia? If you are coding something that super-secret, AutoIt shouldn't be your language of choice in the first place. . i am not paranoid. i just wish that my compiled exe would give out a different error notification. a user of my script may be surprised that he gets an "AutoIt error" instead a "MyProgram error", because he did not expect to have started an Autoit application. [color=rgb(255,0,0);][font="'comic sans ms', cursive;"]FukuLeaks[/color][/font] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnOne Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 . i am not paranoid. i just wish that my compiled exe would give out a different error notification. a user of my script may be surprised that he gets an "AutoIt error" instead a "MyProgram error", because he did not expect to have started an Autoit application. There is a udf for that. But I doubt it covers the compiled script having been tampered with. AutoIt Absolute Beginners Require a serial Pause Script Video Tutorials by Morthawt ipify Monkey's are, like, natures humans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 And I would ask the same question as Melba. Why that level of paranoia? If you are coding something that super-secret, AutoIt shouldn't be your language of choice in the first place. I understand .. I knew I could not secure the software.But I did not think it would be're so easy to get the name "autoit" ..But you know what? It does not really matter to me.But I still prefer that it will be like Edano said Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireFox Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 This answer will be extreme: If your code is well written, no AutoIt Error messagebox will ever show up. JLogan3o13, Edano, mLipok and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 This answer will be extreme: If your code is well written, no AutoIt Error messagebox will ever show up. even if i will do the trick with NotePad++ ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireFox Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 (edited) even if i will do the trick with NotePad++ ? Sure, because everyone enjoy doing this. Try with another application and this one will also have an unexpected behavior. Edited August 15, 2013 by FireFox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edano Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 This answer will be extreme: If your code is well written, no AutoIt Error messagebox will ever show up. . yes that is true, but still the wish is valid. [color=rgb(255,0,0);][font="'comic sans ms', cursive;"]FukuLeaks[/color][/font] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts