New SciTE4AutoIt3 available with SciTE v1.79

[nickston]

You can force func's to be kept in all cases by specifying them in:

It's not good idea. for specify func its need know this func.

Strip functions is strip functions.

My script works well (in any post above), but its wish do with buildin tool (obfuscator)

Edited February 9, 2011 by nickston

[Jos]

It's not good idea. for specify func its need know this func.

Strip functions is strip functions.

My script works well (in any post above), but its wish do with buildin tool (obfuscator)

I didn't look at your script but don't see how you ever can figure our what func is called with this statement:

Call($TRAYNOTIFYIDS[$nID][5], $nID, $lParam)

So how do you figure out what Func's to strip that aren't used in these cases?

Open for suggestions.

Jos

Edited February 9, 2011 by Jos

[nickston]

I didn't look at your script but don't see how you ever can figure our what func is called with this statement:

Call($TRAYNOTIFYIDS[$nID][5], $nID, $lParam)

So how do you figure out what Func's to strip that aren't used in these cases?

Open for suggestions.

Jos

all is very simple.

see at include:

the "Call($TRAYNOTIFYIDS[$nID][5], $nID, $lParam)" is placed in "Func _TrayNotifyIcon($hWnd, $Msg, $wParam, $lParam)" (string 382)

the "_TrayNotifyIcon" is placed in "Func _TrayWndProc($hWnd, $Msg, $wParam, $lParam)" (string 375)

the "_TrayWndProc" is placed in "GUIRegisterMsg($TRAYTIPMSG, "_TrayWndProc") " (string 230)

look at this I think what obfuscator don't see GUIRegisterMsg and then all other

[Jos]

all is very simple.

see at include:

the "Call($TRAYNOTIFYIDS[$nID][5], $nID, $lParam)" is placed in "Func _TrayNotifyIcon($hWnd, $Msg, $wParam, $lParam)" (string 382)

the "_TrayNotifyIcon" is placed in "Func _TrayWndProc($hWnd, $Msg, $wParam, $lParam)" (string 375)

the "_TrayWndProc" is placed in "GUIRegisterMsg($TRAYTIPMSG, "_TrayWndProc") " (string 230)

look at this I think what obfuscator don't see GUIRegisterMsg and then all other

You haven't answered my question: How should Obfuscator know what the content is of $TRAYNOTIFYIDS[$nID][5] so it knows what FUNC this CALL() statement is calling?

Obfuscator does a recursive logic to determine what func is use where, so I can assure you that even if the used FUNC is 10 levels deep, that it will leave all 9 higher level FUNCs in the source. My guess is that you call the missing FUNC via this Call($TRAYNOTIFYIDS[$nID][5], $nID, $lParam) which makes it being stripped.

Jos

Edited February 10, 2011 by Jos

[nickston]

You haven't answered my question: How should Obfuscator know what the content is of $TRAYNOTIFYIDS[$nID][5] so it knows what FUNC this CALL() statement is calling?

Obfuscator does a recursive logic to determine what func is use where, so I can assure you that even if the used FUNC is 10 levels deep, that it will leave all 9 higher level FUNCs in the source. My guess is that you call the missing FUNC via this Call($TRAYNOTIFYIDS[$nID][5], $nID, $lParam) which makes it being stripped.

Jos

Obfuscator don't need to know what content is of $TRAYNOTIFYIDS[$nID][5].

this value of array contents user defined function. that function is determining by user in his script.

1) I defines the one func for all entries of this array field's. and this func is realy exists.

2) I Compiling script without obfuscator (or use my script) and he is working. (ie func is exists)

therefore I can't call missing finc.

and nevertheless obfuscator remove used function.

Edited February 10, 2011 by nickston

[Jos]

Obfuscator don't need to know what content is of $TRAYNOTIFYIDS[$nID][5].

this value of array contents user defined function. that function is determining by user in his script.

1) I defines the one func for all entries of this array field's. and this func is realy exists.

2) I Compiling script without obfuscator (or use my script) and he is working. (ie func is exists)

therefore I can't call missing finc.

and nevertheless obfuscator remove used function.

No idea what you are trying to tell me.

What about you create a "simple" script that shows what you exactly mean. so no includes just a simple script with one or two FUNCs that demonstrates that Obfuscator strips a FUNC with the /so option and how/why you think is shouldn't?

Jos

Edited February 10, 2011 by Jos

[wraithdu]

@nickston

You don't get it. Every function has a name, ie MyFunc. Obfuscator has no way to resolve a variable containing a function's name (string) in order to determine if it's being used. Just take Jos's advice and use the #Obfuscator_Ignore_Funcs directive. If user's of your script/UDF/whatever can define their own functions, then they'll need to take responsibility for adding their own functions to the ignore list as well.

Edited February 10, 2011 by wraithdu

[nickston]

No idea what you are trying to tell me.

What about you create a "simple" script that shows what you exactly mean. so no includes just a simple script with one or two FUNCs that demonstrates that Obfuscator strips a FUNC with the /so option and how/why you think is shouldn't?

Jos

i trying tell what obfuscator remove functions which needed for script.

why and how i dont know ie i dont know how its work.

I have this behavor only with include.

for simple, i have two compilation of my script without obfuscator and with. Compilation without is working, with dont.

I mean what obfuscator doing something wrong. and i supposed what obfuscator remove function.

[nickston]

@nickston

You don't get it. Every function has a name, ie MyFunc. Obfuscator has no way to resolve a variable containing a function's name (string) in order to determine if it's being used. Just take Jos's advice and use the #Obfuscator_Ignore_Funcs directive. If user's of your script/UDF/whatever can define their own functions, then they'll need to take responsibility for adding their own functions to the ignore list as well.

Why?

well ok, We have same aim.

then say me why obfuscator cant do this, but my script can?

Edited February 10, 2011 by nickston

[Jos]

i trying tell what obfuscator remove functions which needed for script.

why and how i dont know ie i dont know how its work.

I have this behavor only with include.

for simple, i have two compilation of my script without obfuscator and with. Compilation without is working, with dont.

I mean what obfuscator doing something wrong. and i supposed what obfuscator remove function.

The stripfunc works very simple.. steps:

1. list all available Func's and keep them in a table

2. Keep track of all Funcs calling other funcs in a table by checking all Function parameters that call FUNCs

3. After this whole process is finished you strip a Funcs that are never call directly or indirectly.

So for step 2 it is important to know exactly what a CALL() statement is calling and that is why Call("abc") is fine and CALL($ABC) is wrong.

There is no real difference between scripts with or without includes as #Include's are inserted at the place the #include statement is located and it all becomes one scriptfile.

Anyway ... There is no problem with Obfuscator's StripFunc functionality unless you have a simple script that shows me the bug.

Jos

Edited February 10, 2011 by Jos

[BrewManNH]

Your script interprets the variable at run time, Obfuscator doesn't run your script, it looks at the contents, sees a function that isn't used and removes it. The reason it doesn't see it being used anywhere in your script is because you're using a variable to call it, this variable's contents will NEVER be known by obfuscator. Either change how you access these functions, even by using a dummy function call that never gets run (which isn't hard to do at all), or using the #Obfuscator_Ignore_Funcs command that you've been told to use to prevent this.

[nickston]

Your script interprets the variable at run time, Obfuscator doesn't run your script, it looks at the contents, sees a function that isn't used and removes it. The reason it doesn't see it being used anywhere in your script is because you're using a variable to call it, this variable's contents will NEVER be known by obfuscator. Either change how you access these functions, even by using a dummy function call that never gets run (which isn't hard to do at all), or using the #Obfuscator_Ignore_Funcs command that you've been told to use to prevent this.

about "my script" i mean script in the first post. this script also remove unused funcs. and its work dont run script.

to the point, it's script dont search "call" (but in this case its work).... hm ...its my omission

Edited February 10, 2011 by nickston

[GEOSoft]

Your script may or may not work, I'm not testing it to find out since I did notice a lot of convoluted code in it.

You may have also made a bad assumption here.

Don't assume that Jos could just take your function and put it into Obfuscator. Just because a tool is used in AutoIt doesn't mean that it is written in AutoIt. Tidy is a perfect example, it's used as a tool for AutoIt scripts but it's not written in AutoIt so any code you write would have to be re-written to be used. If you want to write a script that does something for youur scripts then by all means fly at it but don't expect it to be used elsewhere.

[Jos]

Had a quick look at your script and believe you do a StringInstr() in all records with the FuncNames stored in the array and when found assume the Func is used... correct?

Your script errors out for me when run it against a simple script like this:

#obfuscator_parameters=/so
$a = 1
B($a)
;
Func A()
    $notused=1
EndFunc
;
Func B()
    $used=1
    aa()
EndFunc
;
Func AA()
    $used=1
EndFunc
;
Func BB()
    $notused=1
EndFunc

So what is the output of your script?

[nickston]

Your script may or may not work, I'm not testing it to find out since I did notice a lot of convoluted code in it.

You may have also made a bad assumption here.

Don't assume that Jos could just take your function and put it into Obfuscator. Just because a tool is used in AutoIt doesn't mean that it is written in AutoIt. Tidy is a perfect example, it's used as a tool for AutoIt scripts but it's not written in AutoIt so any code you write would have to be re-written to be used. If you want to write a script that does something for youur scripts then by all means fly at it but don't expect it to be used elsewhere.

i agree with you, my script may not work. I write its only for verify can strip funcs and with it compiled script will working.

my func is only simple example.

i assume so: if obfuscator don't work in my case then may be it can be modified. its worse dont be. a fortiori its possible making (for verify that i write my script).

i think so, the one ability of obfuscator strip funcs. why its ability dont make better?

my be people silence about this:)

[nickston]

Had a quick look at your script and believe you do a StringInstr() in all records with the FuncNames stored in the array and when found assume the Func is used... correct?

Your script errors out for me when run it against a simple script like this:

#obfuscator_parameters=/so
$a = 1
B($a)
;
Func A()
    $notused=1
EndFunc
;
Func B()
    $used=1
    aa()
EndFunc
;
Func AA()
    $used=1
EndFunc
;
Func BB()
    $notused=1
EndFunc

So what is the output of your script?

ok, my script just only exemple

for its working you script must be in include.

for deal:

#obfuscator_parameters=/so
$a = 1
B($a)
;
;
Func B()
    $used=1
    aa()
EndFunc
;
Func AA()
    $used=1
EndFunc
;

i'm in up post write what my script don't search 'call'. its add not hard.

about 'bug' i think obfuscator remove my function in my script not in include.'my function' is function which i submit for $TRAYNOTIFYIDS[$nID][5] and on her Call obfuscator event error.

my strip script dont strip start script only for include.

Edited February 10, 2011 by nickston

[Jos]

ok, my script just only exemple

for its working you script must be in include.

for deal:

i'm in up post write what my script don't search 'call'.

Huh?

I give up for the moment because we are not getting anywhere here.

Post an example as requested and we continue the discussion what is right or wrong in Obfuscator's stripFunc routine.

Jos

Edited February 10, 2011 by Jos

[nickston]

Huh?

I give up for the moment because we are not getting anywhere here.

Post an example as requested and we continue the discussion what is right or wrong in Obfuscator's stripFunc routine.

Jos

well, i understand diferent of obfuscator and my strip script.

I was wrong. I think obfuscator strip wrong include, but obfuscator strip my start script.

My strip script striping only includes, therefor all is ok.

its like obfuscator with key /striponlyinclude,in meaning of striping functions.

thanks for all, put me at rigth way.

Edited February 10, 2011 by nickston

[MvGulik]

Artifact.

Scite4autoit3: Tool: Jump to function ..., Ignoring User-Lib file IF same file(name) is also present as Autoit3-Lib file.

;; Scite4AutoIt3, Jump to Function ... -> jumps to "..\autoit3\included\Date.au3" even if a "Date.au3" is precent as User-Lib file.
;; (not so with Local "Date.au3" file present. Local file is opened.)
#include "Date.au3"
_Now()

_{E:Use -> User}

Edited March 30, 2011 by iEvKI3gv9Wrkd41u

[HimashuGoel]

I have just downloaded this version of SciTE but the program won't work it says

" Runtime Error!

Floating point support not loaded "

Then it closes itself.Please help.